|
SAVE STONY VALLEY |
||||
|
THANK YOU for you help in saving our special wilderness! |
||||
|
THE PROBLEM Should a Wild & Scenic River be part of a firing range? What is the "Swap"? What does Stony Creek offer? ORGANIZATIONS that support our efforts to preserve Stony Creek Valley DIRECTIONS to Stony Creek and a map and links to other maps and rail-trail information PHOTOS in the Valley HOW TO HELP links to legislators and links to other websites BACKGROUND how Stony Creek became the first component in PA's Wild & Scenic River Program. THE
STONY CREEK COALITION- successfully protecting the Stony Creek Valley
Since 1974!
If you have a question or
just want to write in support please use this link info@savestonyvalley.com
Stony Creek Valley Coalition, Inc. 445 Hale Avenue Schedule: News! The Supplemental Environmental Assessment prepared to analyze impact and alternatives for using Stony Creek Valley as a surface danger zone was released mid-January. It can be downloaded at Draft Supplemental Environmental Assessment (DSEA) The Patriot News responded with an editorial entitled '"Under Attack", Wilderness Area Compromised with Gap's Buffer Zone Pact". It covers details such as the revised figure of the number of rounds expected to ricochet into Stony Valley and questions the legality under Pittman-Robertson regulations, but ends by getting to the real issue saying, "If government, and society generally, continue to compromise environmental and conservation values, as increasingly seems to be true, it won't be long before there's little truly wild land left. It's time to say: "Enough is enough. Leave St. Anthony's Wilderness as it is." A report on the situation appeared in Monday, July 2, New York Times. It was on the front page of the National News section. The article can be found at here. Here is a to a photo album from a previous October "drive through". |
On May 2 officials from the National Guard at Indiantown Gap announced to the local media that they were, at least temporarily, ceasing the construction of the Multi Purpose Training Range that would have necessitated use of 900 acres in Stony Creek, State Gameland 211. Thanks to all of you who worked so hard to save Stony Valley once again. Here is the link to the Patriot News Story What is at Stake Just
14 miles north of Harrisburg PA is Saint Anthony's Wilderness, which at
44,000 acres is the largest wilderness area in central or eastern PA. Stony
Creek Valley is the portion of this wilderness most easily reached from
Harrisburg and Lebanon. In fact, it is within a 30 mile drive of 700,000
citizens. 28
years ago the Stony Creek Valley Coalition fought to save Stony Creek Valley
by having Stony Creek designated as a Scenic River under the Pennsylvania
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. We thought then that we had saved this
gem— part of —by preventing any use
other than as wilderness. The PA Game Commission (PGC), which owns the
Valley as part of State Game Land 211—purchased
in part with Federal funds—was
charged with its protection. How
our Largest Eastern PA Wilderness Was Saved The First Time In
1974 PP&L wanted to dam the Creek and flood the Valley to generate
electricity. The Stony Creek Valley Coalition formed in response to this
threat and in 1979 PP&L abandoned its plans. In 1980, the General
Assembly made Stony Creek the first river in Pennsylvania’s Wild &
Scenic River Program. The protected land is 18,000 acres bounding Stony
Creek from ridgetop to ridgetop. A
Needy Neighbor Fort
Indiantown Gap (FTIG), a Pennsylvania National Guard facility, is very
small, hemmed in by public roads and bounded on the south, west and east by
towns, farms and homes. To the north is the wilderness of Stony Creek
Valley. In 1998, the Guard began planning a new training range for tanks.
The Environmental Impact Statement for the range recognized the Valley’s
worth, but claimed that there would be no impact. However, in 2006 we
learned that the EIS was invalid since it was prepared without conducting a
ricochet analysis for the firing range. When a ricochet analysis was finally
prepared in 2007, it showed that hundreds, if not thousands, of rounds from
artillery and cannon fire would fly over the mountaintop and into Stony
Valley every year. In order to shoe-horn this new firing range into the tiny
FTIG site, the Guard decided it needed to acquire several square miles of
the Valley to serve as a “Surface Danger Zone.” It began negotiations
with the PGC to acquire the land though a “swap.” Again, the Coalition
stepped up to save this wilderness area. While we have made progress in
reducing the scope and size of the swap, the battle is not over. The
Swap Sometime
in September 2007, an agreement was signed by PGC staff and the
head of the PA Department of Military and Veterans affairs. The agreement
would give the FTIG absolute control over 900 acres (5%) of the Valley for
90 days a year, including during several hunting seasons. In return, the
FTIG “swaps” a small (430 acre) parcel of land with modest value to the
PGC. FTIG also “promised” that someday, someone (NOT the FTIG) might buy
the Game Commission some additional land, somewhere. In essence, the
proposal is for the PGC to swap 900 acres of wilderness for "Echo
1" which is bounded on all sides by FTIG training ranges. Fortunately, the Agreement does not become final until it
is approved by the Game Commission, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (which
administers the federal grant program that paid for the acquisition of the
Valley), and other officials. We continue to believe that common sense and the
rule of law will win out, as it did over 20 years ago. THERE IS STILL
TIME TO “STOP THE SWAP” AND SAVE OUR WILDERNESS! Contact the Game Commission with
your objections: Pennsylvania Game Commission 2001 Elmerton Avenue Phone or email the Governors Office to let him know you do not want to lose Stony Creek – not one foot, not for one day.
OUR CONCERNS WITH THE LAND SWAP AGREEMENT Things you might want to ask the Governor, the Game Commission, or your legislator about Control over 900 acres, 5% of the “preserved” portion of the Stony Creek Valley, is being traded for 430 acres of land with little or no value to the Game Commission. The PGC and hunters clearly come out on the short end of this swap. Those 430 acres are the ONLY “real” part of this swap. The Agreement makes a vague promise that someone, someday, might give the Game Commission some additional lands (with a value of $2 million) somewhere. The source of the money to buy those lands is not known, except that it definitely WILL NOT come from the Gap. Not much of a swap, is it? Fort Indiantown Gap will be able to exclude everyone from this area for 90 days a year, including most summer weekends. This includes hunters, bird watchers, wildlife photographers, hikers, and anyone else who enjoys the wilderness experience. The exclusion times will include all or portions of most hunting seasons. The only hunting seasons that are fully protected are regular rifle antler and antlerless deer seasons and bear season. Only four weekdays and one Saturday are set aside for each of the Spring and Fall turkey seasons. No other hunting seasons are protected at all. The lands being taken were purchased in part with Federal “Pittman Robertson” (Federal Aid In Wildlife Restoration Act—16 U.S.C. § 669 et seq.)) funds. By law, these lands must be used for the protection of wildlife and kept available for the hunters who paid for them. Restricting access for ¼ of the year, and subjecting wildlife and their habitat to year-round artillery, cannon, and machine gun fire, is a violation of Federal law. Amazingly, under the Agreement, the Game Commission is heavily restricted from evaluating the environmental damage from the hundreds of shells expected to land in the danger zone! The Agreement actually limits environmental assessments to “no more frequently than once per year.” Why does the Gap want so badly to avoid inspections? And why would the Game Commission agree to limit its ability to assess damages on its own lands? The Game Law does not allow the PGC to enter into an agreement of this kind. It may only enter into agreements “for impounding, managing, using, maintaining, and operating lands and waters for game or wildlife management, public hunting and furtaking . . .” (34 Pa.C.S. § 709) Agreements to use state game lands as artillery fire impact zones are not allowed. Why can’t the Game Commission obey the law? The Stony Creek Wild And Scenic River Act is intended to protect this unique wild resource, and the Game Commission is specifically charged with the duty to protect this wilderness. Why can’t it honor its legal obligations?
|
|||
|
Stony
Creek Valley Coalition Last Updated 1/24/07 |
||||